Nov. 6, 2024
Proof - Part 1
In this episode we look at the Star of Bethlehem, Neanderthals, and the Piltdown Man hoax as examples of how the Urantia Book has been ahead of science, and continues to offer advanced knowledge.
1
00:00:00,920 --> 00:00:05,080
So today we're going to talk
about the Urantia book and what
2
00:00:05,080 --> 00:00:09,720
I wrote about my first paper,
which is still available on
3
00:00:09,720 --> 00:00:11,920
Amazon, by the way.
It's called A New Revelation
4
00:00:11,920 --> 00:00:16,920
exploring the Urantia book.
And in this particular chapter,
5
00:00:16,920 --> 00:00:22,560
I go through what I think are
validation points, things that
6
00:00:22,560 --> 00:00:27,400
are proven that the book is a
revelation that somebody
7
00:00:27,400 --> 00:00:29,800
couldn't have made it up.
And the chances that they would
8
00:00:29,800 --> 00:00:35,200
have been right in picking these
facts are just so astronomical
9
00:00:35,200 --> 00:00:38,120
that there's no way anybody
could have made this stuff up.
10
00:00:38,120 --> 00:00:42,720
So it's either somebody was
authentically writing this book
11
00:00:42,720 --> 00:00:46,160
based on information that we
don't have, or somebody was
12
00:00:46,160 --> 00:00:49,200
pretty damn lucky, like a one in
10 million chance.
13
00:00:49,600 --> 00:00:53,080
They'll only roll through just a
few things in the Arantia book
14
00:00:53,800 --> 00:00:58,400
that are are truly revelational.
In other words, the knowledge
15
00:00:58,680 --> 00:01:03,640
did not previously exist until
the book was published in 1955.
16
00:01:04,080 --> 00:01:07,680
S In The Life and Teachings of
Jesus, the revelation states
17
00:01:07,680 --> 00:01:12,840
that Jesus was born at noon on
August 21st 7 BC.
18
00:01:13,800 --> 00:01:18,320
Taking into account the revision
of the Julian calendar and the
19
00:01:18,320 --> 00:01:22,560
narration of the.
The Star of Bethlehem points to
20
00:01:22,560 --> 00:01:27,160
the fact that the same year that
Jesus was born, which was August
21
00:01:27,160 --> 00:01:32,720
21st 7 BC that on May 29th,
September 29th and December 5th
22
00:01:32,720 --> 00:01:36,520
of that year.
Because of the proclivity of men
23
00:01:36,520 --> 00:01:40,480
to mix facts with miracles, the
legend of a bright evening star
24
00:01:40,680 --> 00:01:44,440
appearing as a guiding light to
herald the miraculous birth of
25
00:01:44,440 --> 00:01:47,920
Jesus was later interwoven in
the biblical account.
26
00:01:48,280 --> 00:01:53,720
Now what that means is that for
them to have picked those dates
27
00:01:53,880 --> 00:01:59,720
May 29th, September 29th and
December 5th of seven BC that
28
00:01:59,720 --> 00:02:03,600
they say there was a conjunction
that occurred and that
29
00:02:03,600 --> 00:02:08,000
conjunction was the conjunction
occurred between Jupiter and
30
00:02:08,000 --> 00:02:12,280
Saturn occurring in the
constellation of Pisces on the
31
00:02:12,280 --> 00:02:16,920
exact dates mentioned.
Now, no one knows that except
32
00:02:17,000 --> 00:02:18,800
the for the fact that it's
verifiable.
33
00:02:19,400 --> 00:02:23,040
That's a verifiable fact.
You can go and look back now
34
00:02:23,040 --> 00:02:27,480
with computer models and
actually go back to seven BC
35
00:02:28,000 --> 00:02:31,720
what was in the nighttime sky on
those dates, and you will see
36
00:02:31,720 --> 00:02:35,560
that there is a conjunction of
Jupiter and Saturn in the
37
00:02:35,560 --> 00:02:39,080
constellation of Pisces to add
to that.
38
00:02:39,440 --> 00:02:42,520
But what are the chances they
would have been able to pluck
39
00:02:42,520 --> 00:02:46,040
those dates out of thin air?
And why is it that no one else
40
00:02:46,040 --> 00:02:50,760
has ever discovered that fact?
So that's just one example of
41
00:02:50,760 --> 00:02:53,360
many.
There's another one here too,
42
00:02:55,000 --> 00:02:59,680
which I found interesting.
Back in the 90s there was a
43
00:02:59,680 --> 00:03:03,920
paleontologist who published a
series of articles in National
44
00:03:03,920 --> 00:03:10,600
Geographic talking about the
Neanderthal in 1934.
45
00:03:11,280 --> 00:03:15,640
The following passages appear in
the revelatory text on the
46
00:03:15,640 --> 00:03:19,320
subject of Neanderthals.
The Neanderthalers were
47
00:03:19,320 --> 00:03:21,520
excellent fighters.
This is the quote from the
48
00:03:21,520 --> 00:03:25,320
Urantia book.
And they traveled extensively.
49
00:03:25,760 --> 00:03:29,000
They gradually spread from the
highland centers in northwest
50
00:03:29,000 --> 00:03:33,840
India to France on the West,
China on the east, and even down
51
00:03:33,840 --> 00:03:38,520
into northern Africa.
And regarding the use of tools
52
00:03:38,960 --> 00:03:43,240
that the Neanderthalers used,
the Urantia revelators write
53
00:03:43,440 --> 00:03:48,160
quote the reindeer was highly
useful to these Neanderthal
54
00:03:48,160 --> 00:03:52,760
people serving as food, clothing
since they made various uses of
55
00:03:52,760 --> 00:03:56,080
the horns and bones.
Large flints attached to wooden
56
00:03:56,080 --> 00:04:00,600
handles came back into use and
served as axes and picks.
57
00:04:00,800 --> 00:04:05,200
OK, 2003.
Joe Alper publishes an article
58
00:04:05,640 --> 00:04:10,280
in National Geographic, and he
says other tools found would
59
00:04:10,280 --> 00:04:15,480
have been halved or set in
wooden handles, recovered stones
60
00:04:15,480 --> 00:04:19,640
typically fashioned from nearby
sources of flints or quartz.
61
00:04:20,360 --> 00:04:22,079
Well, that's just what the
Urantia book said.
62
00:04:22,400 --> 00:04:27,520
Urantia book says large flints
attached to wooden handles came
63
00:04:27,520 --> 00:04:30,600
back into use.
Joe Alper writes NOR and
64
00:04:30,600 --> 00:04:34,080
Neanderthal groups mingled and
exchanged mates.
65
00:04:34,600 --> 00:04:37,800
Such interactions may have been
necessary for survival.
66
00:04:37,960 --> 00:04:44,120
Now take that quote from That's
2003 and then compare it to 1934
67
00:04:44,120 --> 00:04:48,120
when the Uranto revelators write
Neanderthals were the first to
68
00:04:48,120 --> 00:04:51,920
adopt the practice of giving the
most successful hunters the
69
00:04:51,920 --> 00:04:57,200
choice of women for wives.
Now how did they know that when
70
00:04:57,200 --> 00:05:01,800
that wasn't even published until
2003 due to more recent
71
00:05:01,800 --> 00:05:04,400
archaeological finds?
The only way they would have
72
00:05:04,400 --> 00:05:08,600
known that is if they were there
or they had knowledge that no
73
00:05:08,600 --> 00:05:12,680
one else apparently had in the
anthropology community.
74
00:05:13,640 --> 00:05:18,360
Now, there's other things too,
and this comes from Calabrese.
75
00:05:18,360 --> 00:05:21,600
It's an interesting examination.
Phil Calabrese is a
76
00:05:21,600 --> 00:05:24,320
mathematician.
He says the chances that the
77
00:05:24,320 --> 00:05:29,440
Urantia book would have falsely
pushed the narrative of the
78
00:05:29,440 --> 00:05:33,520
Piltdown Man turned out to be a
hoax.
79
00:05:33,520 --> 00:05:35,800
I don't know if you know the
story of the Piltdown Man, but
80
00:05:36,080 --> 00:05:41,000
these two guys pretended they
had discovered new fossils and
81
00:05:41,000 --> 00:05:44,280
it turns out that it was a hoax.
So when the Urantia Book was
82
00:05:44,280 --> 00:05:47,800
published, it talks about the
Neanderthal, the CRO, Magnon,
83
00:05:48,120 --> 00:05:53,480
Java, Heidelberg man, but it
doesn't talk about the Piltdown
84
00:05:53,480 --> 00:05:56,200
Man.
Now, it's interesting because at
85
00:05:56,200 --> 00:05:59,320
the time the Urantia book was
first being read, which is in
86
00:05:59,320 --> 00:06:03,520
the late 20s, Piltdown Man was
assumed to be a scientific
87
00:06:03,520 --> 00:06:07,080
accuracy or a fact, and it was
only later be shown to be a
88
00:06:07,080 --> 00:06:09,560
fraud.
But the Arrangi book writers
89
00:06:09,560 --> 00:06:14,080
didn't include it in their book.
Those are just three things that
90
00:06:14,080 --> 00:06:16,800
you could point to that say
foreknowledge.
91
00:06:17,320 --> 00:06:19,000
Next segment we'll talk more
about that.
92
00:06:19,000 --> 00:06:19,520
Hang on.
00:00:00,920 --> 00:00:05,080
So today we're going to talk
about the Urantia book and what
2
00:00:05,080 --> 00:00:09,720
I wrote about my first paper,
which is still available on
3
00:00:09,720 --> 00:00:11,920
Amazon, by the way.
It's called A New Revelation
4
00:00:11,920 --> 00:00:16,920
exploring the Urantia book.
And in this particular chapter,
5
00:00:16,920 --> 00:00:22,560
I go through what I think are
validation points, things that
6
00:00:22,560 --> 00:00:27,400
are proven that the book is a
revelation that somebody
7
00:00:27,400 --> 00:00:29,800
couldn't have made it up.
And the chances that they would
8
00:00:29,800 --> 00:00:35,200
have been right in picking these
facts are just so astronomical
9
00:00:35,200 --> 00:00:38,120
that there's no way anybody
could have made this stuff up.
10
00:00:38,120 --> 00:00:42,720
So it's either somebody was
authentically writing this book
11
00:00:42,720 --> 00:00:46,160
based on information that we
don't have, or somebody was
12
00:00:46,160 --> 00:00:49,200
pretty damn lucky, like a one in
10 million chance.
13
00:00:49,600 --> 00:00:53,080
They'll only roll through just a
few things in the Arantia book
14
00:00:53,800 --> 00:00:58,400
that are are truly revelational.
In other words, the knowledge
15
00:00:58,680 --> 00:01:03,640
did not previously exist until
the book was published in 1955.
16
00:01:04,080 --> 00:01:07,680
S In The Life and Teachings of
Jesus, the revelation states
17
00:01:07,680 --> 00:01:12,840
that Jesus was born at noon on
August 21st 7 BC.
18
00:01:13,800 --> 00:01:18,320
Taking into account the revision
of the Julian calendar and the
19
00:01:18,320 --> 00:01:22,560
narration of the.
The Star of Bethlehem points to
20
00:01:22,560 --> 00:01:27,160
the fact that the same year that
Jesus was born, which was August
21
00:01:27,160 --> 00:01:32,720
21st 7 BC that on May 29th,
September 29th and December 5th
22
00:01:32,720 --> 00:01:36,520
of that year.
Because of the proclivity of men
23
00:01:36,520 --> 00:01:40,480
to mix facts with miracles, the
legend of a bright evening star
24
00:01:40,680 --> 00:01:44,440
appearing as a guiding light to
herald the miraculous birth of
25
00:01:44,440 --> 00:01:47,920
Jesus was later interwoven in
the biblical account.
26
00:01:48,280 --> 00:01:53,720
Now what that means is that for
them to have picked those dates
27
00:01:53,880 --> 00:01:59,720
May 29th, September 29th and
December 5th of seven BC that
28
00:01:59,720 --> 00:02:03,600
they say there was a conjunction
that occurred and that
29
00:02:03,600 --> 00:02:08,000
conjunction was the conjunction
occurred between Jupiter and
30
00:02:08,000 --> 00:02:12,280
Saturn occurring in the
constellation of Pisces on the
31
00:02:12,280 --> 00:02:16,920
exact dates mentioned.
Now, no one knows that except
32
00:02:17,000 --> 00:02:18,800
the for the fact that it's
verifiable.
33
00:02:19,400 --> 00:02:23,040
That's a verifiable fact.
You can go and look back now
34
00:02:23,040 --> 00:02:27,480
with computer models and
actually go back to seven BC
35
00:02:28,000 --> 00:02:31,720
what was in the nighttime sky on
those dates, and you will see
36
00:02:31,720 --> 00:02:35,560
that there is a conjunction of
Jupiter and Saturn in the
37
00:02:35,560 --> 00:02:39,080
constellation of Pisces to add
to that.
38
00:02:39,440 --> 00:02:42,520
But what are the chances they
would have been able to pluck
39
00:02:42,520 --> 00:02:46,040
those dates out of thin air?
And why is it that no one else
40
00:02:46,040 --> 00:02:50,760
has ever discovered that fact?
So that's just one example of
41
00:02:50,760 --> 00:02:53,360
many.
There's another one here too,
42
00:02:55,000 --> 00:02:59,680
which I found interesting.
Back in the 90s there was a
43
00:02:59,680 --> 00:03:03,920
paleontologist who published a
series of articles in National
44
00:03:03,920 --> 00:03:10,600
Geographic talking about the
Neanderthal in 1934.
45
00:03:11,280 --> 00:03:15,640
The following passages appear in
the revelatory text on the
46
00:03:15,640 --> 00:03:19,320
subject of Neanderthals.
The Neanderthalers were
47
00:03:19,320 --> 00:03:21,520
excellent fighters.
This is the quote from the
48
00:03:21,520 --> 00:03:25,320
Urantia book.
And they traveled extensively.
49
00:03:25,760 --> 00:03:29,000
They gradually spread from the
highland centers in northwest
50
00:03:29,000 --> 00:03:33,840
India to France on the West,
China on the east, and even down
51
00:03:33,840 --> 00:03:38,520
into northern Africa.
And regarding the use of tools
52
00:03:38,960 --> 00:03:43,240
that the Neanderthalers used,
the Urantia revelators write
53
00:03:43,440 --> 00:03:48,160
quote the reindeer was highly
useful to these Neanderthal
54
00:03:48,160 --> 00:03:52,760
people serving as food, clothing
since they made various uses of
55
00:03:52,760 --> 00:03:56,080
the horns and bones.
Large flints attached to wooden
56
00:03:56,080 --> 00:04:00,600
handles came back into use and
served as axes and picks.
57
00:04:00,800 --> 00:04:05,200
OK, 2003.
Joe Alper publishes an article
58
00:04:05,640 --> 00:04:10,280
in National Geographic, and he
says other tools found would
59
00:04:10,280 --> 00:04:15,480
have been halved or set in
wooden handles, recovered stones
60
00:04:15,480 --> 00:04:19,640
typically fashioned from nearby
sources of flints or quartz.
61
00:04:20,360 --> 00:04:22,079
Well, that's just what the
Urantia book said.
62
00:04:22,400 --> 00:04:27,520
Urantia book says large flints
attached to wooden handles came
63
00:04:27,520 --> 00:04:30,600
back into use.
Joe Alper writes NOR and
64
00:04:30,600 --> 00:04:34,080
Neanderthal groups mingled and
exchanged mates.
65
00:04:34,600 --> 00:04:37,800
Such interactions may have been
necessary for survival.
66
00:04:37,960 --> 00:04:44,120
Now take that quote from That's
2003 and then compare it to 1934
67
00:04:44,120 --> 00:04:48,120
when the Uranto revelators write
Neanderthals were the first to
68
00:04:48,120 --> 00:04:51,920
adopt the practice of giving the
most successful hunters the
69
00:04:51,920 --> 00:04:57,200
choice of women for wives.
Now how did they know that when
70
00:04:57,200 --> 00:05:01,800
that wasn't even published until
2003 due to more recent
71
00:05:01,800 --> 00:05:04,400
archaeological finds?
The only way they would have
72
00:05:04,400 --> 00:05:08,600
known that is if they were there
or they had knowledge that no
73
00:05:08,600 --> 00:05:12,680
one else apparently had in the
anthropology community.
74
00:05:13,640 --> 00:05:18,360
Now, there's other things too,
and this comes from Calabrese.
75
00:05:18,360 --> 00:05:21,600
It's an interesting examination.
Phil Calabrese is a
76
00:05:21,600 --> 00:05:24,320
mathematician.
He says the chances that the
77
00:05:24,320 --> 00:05:29,440
Urantia book would have falsely
pushed the narrative of the
78
00:05:29,440 --> 00:05:33,520
Piltdown Man turned out to be a
hoax.
79
00:05:33,520 --> 00:05:35,800
I don't know if you know the
story of the Piltdown Man, but
80
00:05:36,080 --> 00:05:41,000
these two guys pretended they
had discovered new fossils and
81
00:05:41,000 --> 00:05:44,280
it turns out that it was a hoax.
So when the Urantia Book was
82
00:05:44,280 --> 00:05:47,800
published, it talks about the
Neanderthal, the CRO, Magnon,
83
00:05:48,120 --> 00:05:53,480
Java, Heidelberg man, but it
doesn't talk about the Piltdown
84
00:05:53,480 --> 00:05:56,200
Man.
Now, it's interesting because at
85
00:05:56,200 --> 00:05:59,320
the time the Urantia book was
first being read, which is in
86
00:05:59,320 --> 00:06:03,520
the late 20s, Piltdown Man was
assumed to be a scientific
87
00:06:03,520 --> 00:06:07,080
accuracy or a fact, and it was
only later be shown to be a
88
00:06:07,080 --> 00:06:09,560
fraud.
But the Arrangi book writers
89
00:06:09,560 --> 00:06:14,080
didn't include it in their book.
Those are just three things that
90
00:06:14,080 --> 00:06:16,800
you could point to that say
foreknowledge.
91
00:06:17,320 --> 00:06:19,000
Next segment we'll talk more
about that.
92
00:06:19,000 --> 00:06:19,520
Hang on.
